Skip to main content
Flare
Back to Blog
Vision

What makes a social network private?

Joan DuarteJune 2, 20264 min read
Two friends sitting on a couch and looking at a casual photo on a phone.

Most apps treat privacy as a boundary around the product. Decide who can see a picture. Hide an account from strangers. Choose whether a profile is visible.

Those controls matter. But they do not answer the question we keep coming back to while building Flare: what makes a social network private once you are already inside it?

A room can have a lock on the door and still feel like a stage.

The scroll changes the room

A recent write-up about an app built with no scroll caught our attention. The argument was simple: remove the endless list and the app stops asking for the same kind of attention.

We have been thinking about the same constraint from a slightly different direction. Flare does not have a feed. Your friends send little moments, and your social orb helps you catch up with what they have been up to. You can talk back to it. There is no follower count and no public stream to maintain.

That choice is not only about screen time. It changes what a picture is for.

In a scrolling list, every picture becomes one item among many. Even when the audience is small, the structure quietly asks each photo to compete with the next one. Is this worth sharing? Is it interesting enough? Will anyone react?

We wanted to remove that test. A photo from a friend should be allowed to be ordinary.

Private is not the same as hidden

When people search for a social network private enough for their friends, the obvious answer is better controls. Smaller groups. Locked profiles. Fewer strangers.

But the harder part is removing the parts of the product that turn friends into an audience.

A list of people can still become a scoreboard. A timeline can still become a performance. A reaction counter can still make a quiet photo feel like it failed. This is why we wrote The list is not the friendship, and why we keep returning to the same product constraint from different angles.

Privacy has a social texture. You notice it when you do not need to prepare before sending something. You notice it when the app does not ask you to keep up with everything. You notice it when a picture can be a small update rather than a tiny publication.

We are still figuring out the shape

We are about 100 people in. That is enough to notice where the product feels calm and where it still asks for too much work. It is not enough to declare that we have solved anything.

The social orb is our current attempt at a different catch-up pattern. Instead of opening a stream and sorting through every update yourself, you can ask what your friends have been doing. That is the idea, at least. We are still learning which parts feel useful and which parts feel like another layer between you and the people you care about.

There is a useful tension here. The app should help you stay in touch without turning friendship into a task list. We wrote more about that in How to stay in touch with friends without keeping up with everything.

A smaller test

For now, our test for a private social app is fairly plain.

Can you send a photo that would never survive a public timeline?

Can you open the app without being handed a pile of things to process?

Can a friend share something boring and still have it feel worth receiving?

If the answer is yes, the product is probably shaped around friendship rather than attention. That is the room we are trying to build. Small enough that nobody needs to take the stage.

Joan Duarte

Joan Duarte

Founder & CEO